4.6 Article

Ocular Toxicity in BRAF Mutant Cutaneous Melanoma Patients Treated With Vemurafenib

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 158, Issue 4, Pages 831-837

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.07.003

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Plexxikon
  2. Roche
  3. Genentech
  4. EyeGate
  5. National Eye Institute
  6. US Food and Drug Administration
  7. Lions Club International Foundation
  8. National Institutes of Health
  9. F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, Nutley, New Jersey
  10. Plexxikon Inc, Berkeley, California
  11. Research to Prevent Blindness (New York, New York)
  12. Paul and Evanina Mackall Foundation Trust (New York, New York)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: To determine the frequency of ocular adverse effects associated with vemurafenib (PLX4032) treatment for metastatic cutaneous melanoma. DESIGN: Retrospective review of the clinical study reports from the clinical pharmacology, phase 1, phase 2, and phase 3 trials of vemurafenib. METHODS: The vemurafenib clinical trials were a multicenter series involving adult patients with histologically confirmed, BRAF(V600) mutation positive, unresectable, stage IIIC or IV melanoma. A total of 855 patients were enrolled in the trials: 568 patients were treated with vemurafenib and 287 patients were treated with dacarbazine. RESULTS: Among the 568 patients treated with vemurafenib, ocular adverse effects developed in 22% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.5-25.6). The most common ocular diagnosis was uveitis (4.0%; 95% CI, 2.6-6.0), followed by conjunctivitis (2.8%; 95% CI, 1.6-4.5) and dry eyes (2.0%; 95% CI, 1.1-3.7). All were successfully managed while vemurafenib therapy was continued. CONCLUSIONS: Ocular adverse events and symptoms may be seen in more than one-fifth of patients being treated with vemurafenib. However, vemurafenib can be continued while the ocular symptoms are being managed. The pathogenesis of ocular symptoms in this patient population is unclear; additional studies are necessary. (C) 2014 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available