4.6 Article

Axial Length and Outcomes of Macular Hole Surgery Assessed by Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 151, Issue 1, Pages 118-127

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.07.007

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), Tokyo, Japan [20592038]
  2. Topcon Corporation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE: To use spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD OCT) to evaluate macular hole surgery outcomes and features predicting anatomic failure. DESIGN: Retrospective, interventional case series. METHODS: Fifty-two eyes of 50 consecutive patients with macular holes were examined. All eyes underwent 3-port pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling. Eyes were examined after surgery by dense serial SD OCT scanning over the macula. RESULTS: Eyes with initial anatomic failure were significantly more likely to have greater axial length and refractive error and more posterior staphyloma compared with eyes with initial anatomic success (P = .031 to .0060, < .0001). Overall initial and final anatomic success rates were 92.3% (48 of 52 eyes). In highly myopic eyes with axial lengths of 26.0 mm or more, initial and final success rates were 73.3% (11 of 15 eyes) compared with 100.0% (37 of 37 eyes) of eyes with axial lengths of less than 26.0 mm (P = .0050). In highly myopic eyes, initial and final success rates were 0% (0 of 3 eyes) of eyes with axial lengths of 30.0 mm or more compared with 91.7% (11 of 12 eyes) of eyes with axial lengths of 26.0 mm or more and of less than 30.0 mm (P < .0001). Retinoschisis-like thickening of the outer retina was seen in 3 (75.0%) of 4 eyes with initial failure compared with 3 (6.3%) of 48 eyes with initial success (P = .0030). CONCLUSIONS: Axial length of 30.0 mm or more may increase the risk of anatomic failure of macular hole surgery. (Am J Ophthalmol 2011;151:118-127. (c) 2011 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available