4.6 Article

Casecontrol analysis of maternal prenatal analgesic use and cardiovascular malformations: Baltimore-Washington Infant Study

Journal

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.03.054

Keywords

analgesics; birth defects; cardiovascular malformations; congenital heart defects; pregnancy

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [R-37 HL25629]
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Experience Applied Epidemiology Fellowship, Pfizer Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess maternal prenatal use of analgesics and risk of cardiovascular malformations (CVM) in the offspring. STUDY DESIGN: Data from the Baltimore-Washington Infant Study, a population-based case-control investigation of CVM, were used to examine selected isolated CVM diagnoses and maternal analgesic use during the periconceptional period (3 months before and after conception). We compared case and control infants on frequency of maternal use of analgesics and estimated adjusted odds ratios (adjORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) with logistic regression models for specific CVM phenotypes. RESULTS: Frequency of periconceptional use of any analgesic was 52% among control mothers and 53% among case mothers. Analyses by CVM diagnoses identified an association of tetralogy of Fallot with maternal acetaminophen use (adjOR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.3) and dextrotransposition of the great arteries with intact ventricular septum with maternal nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug use (adjOR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.2-8.7). CONCLUSION: Analgesic use during the periconceptional period was not associated with CVM in the aggregate or with most phenotypes of CVM examined. Associations with 2 phenotypes of CVM may have occurred by chance. These findings warrant corroboration and further study, including further evaluation of the observed associations, the dose of analgesic taken, more specific timing of analgesic use, and indications for use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available