4.7 Article

Development of species-specific primers for rapid identification of Debaryomyces hansenii

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 193, Issue -, Pages 109-113

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.10.011

Keywords

Debaryomyces hansenii; Yeasts; Species-specific primers; PCR; Rapid-identification; Foods

Funding

  1. PICATA predoctoral fellowship (CEI Campus Moncloa, UCM-UPM, Madrid, Spain)
  2. Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports [FPU 12/03223]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, we developed a specific PCR assay for Debaryomyces hansenii strains that uses a putative homologous PAD1 region (729 bp) present in this yeast species as a target. The amplification of this sequence with the D. hansenii specific primer pair (DhPADF/DhPADR) was found to be a rapid, specific and an affordable method enabling identification of D. hansenii from other yeast strains. Primers were tested in almost 100 strains, 49 strains from Type Culture Collection belonging to the genus Debaryomyces and to other yeast species commonly found in foods or related genera. These primers were able to discriminate between closely related species of Debaryomyces, such as Debaryomyces fabryi and Debaryomyces subglobosus, with a 100% detection rate for D. hansenii. Also, the method was tested in 45 strains from different foods. Results confirmed the specificity of the PCR method and detected two earlier misidentifications of D. hansenii strains obtained by RFLP analysis of the 5.8S ITS rDNA region. Subsequently we confirmed by sequencing the D1/D2 domain of 265 rDNA that these strains belonged to D. fabryi. We call attention in this work to the fact that the RFLPs of the 5.8S ITS rDNA profiles of D. hansenii, D. fabryi and D. subglobosus are the same and this technique will thus lead to incorrect identifications. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available