4.5 Article

Effects of Mycophenolate Mofetil Combined with Corticosteroids for Induction Therapy of Microscopic Polyangiitis

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages 185-192

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000324364

Keywords

Mycophenolate mofetil; Cyclophosphamide; Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies; Vasculitis; Remission

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of PR China [30801148]
  2. Key Projects in the National Science & Technology Pillar Program [2008BAI60B04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: We prospectively compared the effects of oral mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVC) combined with corticosteroids for induction therapy of microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) with renal involvement over a follow-up period of 6 months. Methods: 41 MPA patients were randomly assigned to either the open-label MMF group or the IVC group. Patients in the MMF group (n = 19) received oral MMF 1.0 g/day (1.5 g/day for patients with a body weight > 70 kg) and patients in the IVC group (n = 22) received IVC in monthly pulses of 1.0 g per pulse (0.8 g per pulse for patients with a body weight < 50 kg). Both groups received intravenous methylprednisolone 360-500 mg/day for 3 days, followed by oral prednisone 0.6-0.8 mg/kg/day and gradual tapering. Results: There was no significant difference of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) level between the IVC and MMF groups at baseline. At 6 months, the eGFR level increased significantly in both groups, but there was no significant difference between the two. Three patients in the IVC group and 1 in the MMF group received maintenance dialysis within 6 months (p = 0.36). The remission rate was 63.6% in the IVC group and 78.9% in the MMF group (p = 0.23). Conclusion: MMF is effective for inducing remission in Chinese MPA patients and may represent an alternative therapy to monthly impulses of IVC. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available