4.1 Article

Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (MTHFR) C677T and A1298C Polymorphisms and Age of Onset in Schizophrenia: A Combined Analysis of Independent Samples

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.b.31160

Keywords

methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene (MTHFR); schizophrenia; age of onset

Funding

  1. Pozan University Medical Sciences [502-01-01124182-07474]
  2. Copenhagen Hospital
  3. Danish National Psychiatric Research Foundation
  4. Danish Agency for Science, and Technology and Innovation (Centre for Pharmacogenetics)
  5. Research Council of Norway [163070/V50, 167153/V50]
  6. South-Eastern Norway Health Authority [123/2004]
  7. Oslo University Hospital
  8. University of Oslo
  9. Swedish Research Council [2006-2992, 2006-986, 2008-2167]
  10. Stockholm County Council
  11. Karolinska Institutet
  12. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  13. HUBIN project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) is involved in the one-carbon cycle, which is of importance for nucleotide synthesis and methylation of DNA, membranes, proteins and lipids. The MTHFR gene includes two common polymorphisms (rs1801133 or C677T; rs1801131 or A1298C) which both alter enzyme activity. The T-allele of the C677T polymorphism has recently been associated with earlier age at onset of schizophrenia. In the present study we examined the association between the MTHFR C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and age at onset of schizophrenia in twelve samples consisting of 3,213 unrelated schizophrenia patients, including the original Scandinavian sample. There was no consistent relationship between MTHFR C677T, A1298C or combined 677T/1298C carriers and age of onset in schizophrenia when the results of each study were combined using meta-analysis. The present results suggest that the investigated MTHFR polymorphisms do not influence age of onset in schizophrenia. (C) 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available