4.2 Article

A de novo 1.4-Mb Deletion at 21q22.11 in a Boy With Developmental Delay

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
Volume 164, Issue 4, Pages 1021-1028

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36377

Keywords

21q22; 11 deletion; developmental delay; fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH); copy number analysis; ITSN1

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan
  2. fund for Creation of Innovation Centers for Advanced Interdisciplinary Research Areas Program in the Project for Developing Innovation Systems
  3. Strategic Research Program for Brain Sciences
  4. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  5. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  6. Takeda Science Foundation
  7. Yokohama Foundation for Advancement of Medical Science
  8. Hayashi Memorial Foundation for Female Natural Scientists

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Monosomy 21 is a very rare chromosomal abnormality. At least 45 patients with partial deletion involving 21q11 have been reported. Here, we report a Japanese boy who presented with pre- and postnatal growth delays, psychomotor developmental delay, microcephaly, and iris coloboma. Cytogenetic analysis revealed a de novo 1.4-Mb deletion at 21q22.11 containing 19 protein-coding RefSeq genes. We compared the clinical phenotypes between the present patient and 16 previously reported patients with a deleted region associated with postnatal growth delay and psychomotor developmental delay. Interestingly, ITSN1 was the only gene deleted or disrupted in all cases; this gene is known to be associated with intellectual disability. Microcephaly and brain structural abnormalities including polymicrogyria and agenesis/hypoplasia of the corpus callosum may also result from haploinsufficiency of ITSN1, highlighting its clinical significance for the neurological features of patients with monosomy 21. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available