4.2 Article

Growth in Chilean infants with chromosome 22q11 microdeletion syndrome

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
Volume 158A, Issue 11, Pages 2682-2686

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.35525

Keywords

22q11 deletion; congenital heart disease; DiGeorge syndrome; growth curves

Funding

  1. Fondecyt-Chile [1061051, 1100131]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chromosome 22q11 microdeletion syndrome has a wide range of clinical manifestations including congenital heart malformations, palatal defects, endocrine abnormalities, immunologic deficits, learning difficulties, and an increased predisposition to psychiatric disease. Short stature and poor weight gain in infancy are common findings and are usually seen in the absence of hormone deficiencies. An increased frequency of obesity has been observed in adolescents and adults. We generated gender-specific growth curves from 0 to 24 months of age, based on 479 length and 475 weight measurements from 138 Chilean patients with 22q11 deletion. Final adult height and weight on 25 individuals were analyzed. The 10th, 50th, and 90th centile-smoothed curves for infants were built using the LMS method and compared with World Health Organization Child Growth Standards. The 50th centile for length in the deleted patients was slightly lower than the 10th centile of WHO standards in boys and girls. The same was observed for weight, although a trend toward a gradual increase near 2 years of age was observed, particularly in boys. Average adult height was 152?cm (ranging from 143 to 162?cm) in females, corresponding to the 10th centiles of WHO standards, and 166?cm for males (160172?cm), at the 20th centile of WHO standards. A third of the adult females and none of the males had body mass index (BMI) greater than 25. The curves should be useful to monitor growth in infants with 22q11 microdeletion syndrome. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available