4.2 Article

Analysis of Congenital Heart Defects in 87 Consecutive Patients With Brachmann-de Lange Syndrome

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A
Volume 149A, Issue 6, Pages 1268-1272

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32838

Keywords

congenital heart defects; Brachmann-de Lange syndrome; Cornelia de Lange syndrome; hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; pulmonary stenosis

Funding

  1. Italian ISS Rare Disease Project [N.526D/58]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Congenital heart defects (CHDs) have been estimated to occur in similar to 20% of patients with Brachmann-de Lange syndrome (BDLS, also known as Cornelia de Lange syndrome, OMIM 122470). We report on the results of a prospective echocardiographic evaluation of a cohort of 87 Italian BDLS patients with longitudinal follow-up from 5 to 12 years. A cardiac anomaly was identified in 29/87 (33.3%) including 28 (32.2%) patients with a structural CHD, and an additional patient (1.2%) with isolated non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Of the 28 patients with a CHD, 12 (42.9%) had an isolated obstructive CHD, 10 of which were pulmonary stenosis (36%), 8 (28.6%) had an isolated left to right shunt, and the remainder showed a combination of structural anomalies. Overall incidence of pulmonary stenosis was 39% (11/28). Isolated late-onset mitral or tricuspid valve dysplasia, albeit hemodynamically insignificant, was detected at follow-up examination in 4 (14.3%) patients older than 10 years, previously known to be normal. In contrast to previous studies, only two patients required surgery, one for closure of a large perimembranous ventricular septal defect (VSD) and associated ASD closure (1), and another for VSD closure and relief of pulmonary valve stenosis (1). The remainder are receiving medical follow-up. We believe that the overall frequency (33.3%) and evidence of 4 late onset dysplastic valves anomalies justifies both echocardiographic assessment in all BDLS patients at the first diagnostic assessment, and later on during medical follow-up. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available