4.6 Article

Hepatorenal Syndrome: A Severe, but Treatable, Cause of Kidney Failure in Cirrhosis

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES
Volume 59, Issue 6, Pages 874-885

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.12.032

Keywords

Cirrhosis; ascites; chronic liver diseases

Funding

  1. Instituto Reina Sofia de Investigacion Nefrologica (IRSIN)
  2. Fondo de Investigacion Sanitaria (FIS) [PI080126, EC/90077]
  3. Ciber de Enfermedades Hepaticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD)
  4. Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministerio de Sanidad, Espana

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is a unique type of kidney failure that occurs in advanced cirrhosis. It is characterized by functional impairment of the kidneys due to vasoconstriction of the renal arteries in the setting of preserved tubular function and absence of significant histologic abnormalities. Renal vasoconstriction in HRS is due to severe vasodilation of the splanchnic arteries associated with portal hypertension, leading to a decrease in effective arterial blood volume and arterial pressure. HRS commonly develops after a trigger, usually a bacterial infection, that disrupts the arterial circulation, but it also may occur spontaneously. There are 2 forms of HRS: type 1 is characterized by an acute progressive decrease in kidney function and very short survival without treatment, whereas type 2 features stable less severe kidney failure and longer survival compared with type 1. A liver transplant is the preferred treatment for HRS. Pharmacologic treatment with vasoconstrictors to reverse splanchnic vasodilation, together with albumin, is effective in 40%-50% of patients with type 1 HRS and improves survival. The drug of choice is the vasopressin analogue terlipressin. Renal replacement therapy should not be used as first-line therapy. Am J Kidney Dis. 59(6):874-885. (C) 2012 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available