4.7 Article

Poor Correlations in the Levels of Pathogenic Mitochondrial DNA Mutations in Polar Bodies versus Oocytes and Blastomeres in Humans

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume 88, Issue 4, Pages 494-498

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.03.010

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. l'Association Francaise contre les Myopathies
  2. Agence de la Biomedecine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Because the mtDNA amount remains stable in the early embryo until uterine implantation, early human development is completely dependent on the mtDNA pool of the mature oocyte. Both quantitative and qualitative mtDNA defects therefore may negatively impact oocyte competence or early embryonic development. However, nothing is known about segregation of mutant and wild-type mtDNA molecules during human meiosis. To investigate this point, we compared the mutant levels in 51 first polar bodies (PBs) and their counterpart (oocytes, blastomeres, or whole embryos), at risk of having (1) the MELAS m.3243A > G mutation in MT-TL1 (n = 30), (2) the MERRF m.8344A > G mutation in MT-TK (n = 15), and (3) the m.9185T > G mutation located in MT-ATP6 (n = 6). Seven out of 51 of the PBs were mutation free and had homoplasmic wild-type counterparts. In the heteroplasmic PBs, measurement of the mutant load was a rough estimate of the counterpart mutation level (R-2 = 0.52), and high mutant-load differentials between the two populations were occasionally observed (ranging from -34% to +34%). The mutant-load differentials between the PB and its counterpart were higher in highly mutated PBs, suggestive of a selection process acting against highly mutated cells during gametogenesis or early embryonic development. Finally, individual discrepancies in mutant loads between PBs and their counterparts make PB-based preconception diagnosis unreliable for the prevention of mtDNA disorder transmission. Such differences were not observed in animal models, and they emphasize the need to conduct thorough studies on mtDNA segregation in humans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available