4.6 Article

Gender-specific Associations Between Soy and Risk of Hip Fracture in the Singapore Chinese Health Study

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 170, Issue 7, Pages 901-909

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwp220

Keywords

Asian Continental Ancestry Group; hip fractures; isoflavones; osteoporosis; soy foods

Funding

  1. National Medical Research Council, Singapore [NMRC/EDG/0011/2007]
  2. National Institutes of Health, United States [NCI R01 CA55069, R35 CA53890, R01 CA80205]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although there is some epidemiologic evidence that soy may reduce risk of osteoporotic fracture in women, it is not known whether this risk reduction also occurs for men. The authors examined gender-specific associations between soy intake and hip fracture risk in the Singapore Chinese Health Study, a prospective cohort of 63,257 Chinese living in Singapore. At recruitment between 1993 and 1998, each subject was administered a food frequency questionnaire and questions on medical history and lifestyle factors. As of December 31, 2006, 276 incident cases of hip fracture in men and 692 cases in women were identified via linkage with hospital discharge databases. For both genders, hip fracture risk was positively associated with cigarette smoking and was inversely associated with body mass index. There was a statistically significant association of tofu equivalents, soy protein, and isoflavones with hip fracture risk among women but not among men. Compared with women in the lowest quartile of intakes for tofu equivalents (< 49.4 g/day), soy protein (< 2.7 g/day), and isoflavones (< 5.8 mg/1,000 kcal/day), those in the second-fourth quartiles exhibited 21%-36% reductions in risk (all P < 0.036). Risk levels were comparable across the second, third, and fourth quartiles of soy intake categories.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available