4.3 Article

Intermethod differences in results for total PSA, free PSA, and percentage of free PSA

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
Volume 129, Issue 6, Pages 952-958

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL PATHOLOGY
DOI: 10.1309/JYBPMFNUF6EYY9TB

Keywords

prostate-specific antigen; PSA; free PSA; method comparison

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assays differ in calibration and response to different PSA forms. We examined intermethod differences in total PSA (tPSA) and free PSA (fPSA) measurements. We tested 157 samples with tPSA concentrations of 2 to 10 ng/mL (2-10 mu g/L) using 6 PSA/fPSA method pairs and 1 tPSA method: AD VIA Centaur (complexed and total; Siemens Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY), ARCHITECT i2000(SR) (Abbott Diagnostics, Abbott Park, IL), AxSYM (Abbott Diagnostics), IMMULITE 2000 (Siemens Diagnostics), Modular El 70 (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN), UniCel DxI 800 (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA), and VITROS ECi (tPSA only; Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics, Raritan, NJ). Regression analysis was performed for PSA, fPSA, and percentage of fPSA with the ARCHITECT i2000SR comparison method. Differences between test and comparison methods were estimated at 2.5, 4.0, and 10.0 ng/mL (2.5, 4. 0, and 10.0 mu g/L) for tPSA and 15%, 20%, and 25% for percentage of fPSA. Relative differences were more than 10% at 4.0 ng/mL (4.0 mu g/L) tPSA for the Centaur, IMMULITE, ECi, and DxI methods. At 20% fPSA, the relative difference was more than 10% for all methods except the AxSYM. Additional harmonization is needed for tPSA and fPSA methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available