4.7 Article

Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence by Ginsenoside Rh2

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CHINESE MEDICINE
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages 817-831

Publisher

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0192415X14500529

Keywords

Chinese Herbal Medicine; Ginsenoside Rh2; Leak Point Pressure; Maximum Urethral Closure Pressure; Stress Urinary Incontinence; Vaginal Distention

Funding

  1. Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology [NSC101-2314-B-039-018, NSC102-2320-B-039-025]
  2. CMU under the Aim for Top University Plan of the Taiwan Ministry of Education, China Medical University Hospital [DMR-102-059]
  3. Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare Clinical Trial and Research Center of Excellence [DOH102-TD-B-111-004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common disorder in middle-aged women and the elderly. Although surgical treatment of SUI has progressed, there are no effective pharmacological therapies without a side effect. We studied the effect of ginsenoside Rh2 against SUI. Here, we studied the effect of ginsenoside Rh2 on the contractile force of the urethra and blood vessels in an ex vivo organ bath assay. We further investigated the mechanisms and effects of Rh2 in cell culture and animal models. Ginsenoside Rh2 dose-dependently reduced lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced nitric oxide (NO) production and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression in RAW 264.7 cells. In the vaginal distension (VD)-induced SUI mouse model, ginsenoside Rh2 significantly reversed the VD-induced SUI physical signs and reduced blood pressure. The modulation of several SUI-related proteins, including myosin, survival motor neuron (SMN) protein, alpha-adrenergic receptor 1a (AdR1a), and superoxide dismutase 3 (SOD3), may play some crucial roles in the therapeutic approaches against SUI. In conclusion, the ginsenoside Rh2 may offer therapeutic potential against SUI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available