4.4 Article

Noninvasive Cardiac Output Measurement by Inert Gas Rebreathing in Suspected Pulmonary Hypertension

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 113, Issue 3, Pages 546-551

Publisher

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.10.017

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to evaluate inert gas rebreathing (IGR) reliability in cardiac output (CO) measurement compared with Fick method and thermodilution. IGR is a noninvasive method for CO measurement; CO by IGR is calculated as pulmonary blood flow plus intrapulmonary shunt. IGR may be ideal for follow-up of patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH), sparing the need of repeated invasive right-sided cardiac catheterization. Right-sided cardiac catheterization with CO measurement by thermodilution, Fick method, and IGR was performed in 125 patients with possible PH by echocardiography. Patients were grouped according to right-sided cardiac catheterization measured mean pulmonary and wedge pressures: normal pulmonary arterial pressure (n = 20, mean pulmonary arterial pressure = 18 +/- 3 mm Hg, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure = 11 +/- 5 mm Hg), PH and normal pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PH-NW, n = 37 mean pulmonary arterial pressure = 42 +/- 13 mm Hg, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure = 11 +/- 6 mm Hg), and PH and high pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PH-HW, n = 68, mean pulmonary arterial pressure = 37 +/- 9 mm Hg, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure = 24 +/- 6 mm Hg). Thermodilution and Fick measurements were comparable. Fick and IGR agreement was observed in normal pulmonary arterial pressure (CO = 4.10 +/- 1.14 and 4.08 +/- 0.97 L/min, respectively), whereas IGR overestimated Fick in patients with PH-NW and those with PH-HW because of intrapulmonary shunting overestimation in hypoxemic patients. When patients with arterial oxygen saturation (SO2) <= 90% were excluded, IGR and Fick agreement improved in PH-NW (CO = 4.90 +/- 1.70 and 4.76 +/- 1.35 L/min, respectively) and PH-HW (CO = 4.05 +/- 1.04 and 4.10 +/- 1.17 L/min, respectively). In hypoxemic patients, we estimated pulmonary shunt as Fick pulmonary blood flow and calculated shunt as: -0.2423 x arterial SO2 + 21.373 L/min. In conclusion, IGR is reliable for CO measurement in patients with PH with arterial SO2 >90%. For patients with arterial SO2 <= 90%, a new formula for shunt calculation is proposed. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available