4.4 Article

Plasma N-Terminal Prohormone Brain Natriuretic Peptide as a Marker for Postoperative Cardiac Events in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages 137-140

Publisher

EXCERPTA MEDICA INC-ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.03.005

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, School of Medicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study considered if N-terminal prohormone brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) is associated with increased risk for postoperative cardiac events in high-risk patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. In addition, this report describes how levels of NT-proBNIP are affected by noncardiac surgery. The study design was a prospective cohort study that enrolled 83 patients age >= 50 years with >= 1 risk factor for coronary artery disease having intermediate or high-risk noncardiac surgery. NT-proBNP levels were measured preoperatively and on postoperative days 1 and 3. During the month following surgery, 25 patients (33%) had a combined 37 postoperative cardiac events including 15 episodes of heart failure (20%), 12 episodes of new dysrhythmia (16%), 7 myocardial infarctions (9%) and 3 cardiac arrests (4%). Preoperative NT-proBNP level >= 457 pg/nd was significantly associated with occurrence of a postoperative cardiac event (odds ratio 10.5, 95% confidence interval 1.9 to 56.6, p = 0.006). After surgery, 64 of 72 patients (89%) had an increase in NT-proBNP from their preoperative level. In conclusion, this study determined there was a significant association between elevated preoperative NT-proBNP and occurrence of a postoperative cardiac event. In addition, increased NT-proBNP after noncardiac surgery is not uncommon even in the absence of clinically identifiable heart failure. (c) 2009 Elsevier Inc. (Am J Cardiol 2009;104:137-140)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available