4.5 Article

Clinical implications of midventricular obstruction and intravenous propranolol use in transient left ventricular apical ballooning (Tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy)

Journal

AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 155, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.10.042

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Persistent hypotension with dynamic midventricular obstruction (MVO) in patients with transient left ventricular (LV) apical ballooning (Tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy) is an important complication that needs to be treated. Purpose The objective of this study is to determine the effects of intravenous propranolol challenge on MVO in transient LV apical ballooning. Subjects and Methods Thirty-four patients (12 males, 22 females, mean age 64 +/- 17 years, age range 22-84 years) with LV apical ballooning were enrolled. The hemodynamic and echocardiogrophic effects of propranolol (0.05 mg/kg, maximum 4 mg) were analyzed in 13 patients. Results (1) Midventricular obstruction was present in 8 (24%) of 34 patients, and the pressure gradient (PG) ranged from 28 to 140 mm Hg. (2) Patients with MVO had similar demographic and clinical characteristics (symptoms, peak creatine kinase, plasma catecholamine levels) as those without MVO; however, in patients with MVO, abnormal a waves on electrocardiogram and hypotension were more prevalent. (3) In the MVO group, intravenous propranolol changed the PG from 90 +/- 42 to 22 +/- 9 mm Hg, the systolic blood pressure (SBP) from 85 +/- 11 to 116 +/- 20 mm Hg, and the LV ejection fraction (LVEF) from 30% +/- 7% to 43% +/- 4%. (4) In all subjects, the changes in the PG after propranolol injection had a significant linear correlation with the SBP and LVEF changes: Delta SBP = 4.738 + 0.315 x Delta PG (r = 0.689 (P < .001) and Delta LVEF = 2.973 + 0.1321 x Delta PG (r = 0.715, P < .001). Conclusion Intravenous propranolol is useful for treating dynamic MVO in patients with transient LV apical ballooning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available