Connecting Diverse Knowledge Systems for Enhanced Ecosystem Governance: The Multiple Evidence Base Approach
Published 2014 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Connecting Diverse Knowledge Systems for Enhanced Ecosystem Governance: The Multiple Evidence Base Approach
Authors
Keywords
Local knowledge, Indigenous knowledge, Complementarity, Validation, Ecosystem assessments, Co-production of knowledge
Journal
AMBIO
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages 579-591
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2014-03-21
DOI
10.1007/s13280-014-0501-3
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Integration of Local Ecological Knowledge and Conventional Science: a Study of Seven Community-Based Forestry Organizations in the USA
- (2016) Heidi L. Ballard et al. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY
- Commonalities and complementarities among approaches to conservation monitoring and evaluation
- (2013) Michael B. Mascia et al. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
- Culture, law, risk and governance: contexts of traditional knowledge in climate change adaptation
- (2013) Terry Williams et al. CLIMATIC CHANGE
- Opening up knowledge systems for better responses to global environmental change
- (2013) Sarah Cornell et al. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY
- Complementary Viewpoints: Scientific and Local Knowledge of Ungulates in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest
- (2013) Helbert Medeiros Prado et al. JOURNAL OF ETHNOBIOLOGY
- How can local and traditional knowledge be effectively incorporated into international assessments?
- (2013) William J. Sutherland et al. ORYX
- Multi-scale and cross-scale assessments of social–ecological systems and their ecosystem services
- (2013) RJ Scholes et al. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
- Linking Public Participation in Scientific Research to the Indicators and Needs of International Environmental Agreements
- (2013) Finn Danielsen et al. Conservation Letters
- Public Participation in Scientific Research: a Framework for Deliberate Design
- (2012) Jennifer L. Shirk et al. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY
- The role of agricultural biodiversity in strengthening resilience to climate change: towards an analytical framework
- (2012) Dunja Mijatović et al. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability
- Listen to the voices of experience
- (2012) Esther Turnhout et al. NATURE
- Reconnecting to the Biosphere
- (2011) Carl Folke et al. AMBIO
- Indigenous Knowledge, Science, and Resilience: What Have We Learned from a Decade of International Literature on "Integration"?
- (2011) Erin L. Bohensky et al. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY
- Is Validation of Indigenous Ecological Knowledge a Disrespectful Process? A Case Study of Traditional Fishing Poisons and Invasive Fish Management from the Wet Tropics, Australia
- (2011) Monica Gratani et al. ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY
- Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: Learning to adapt in Canada's Arctic
- (2011) Derek Armitage et al. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS
- Looking past the wallpaper: Considerate evaluation of traditional environmental knowledge by science
- (2010) Phil O'B Lyver et al. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND
- Cross‐cultural environmental research and management: Challenges and progress
- (2010) Janet Stephenson et al. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF NEW ZEALAND
- Guidelines for cross‐cultural Participatory Action Research partnerships: A case study of a customary seabird harvest in New Zealand
- (2010) Henrik Moller et al. NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY
- Sciences, knowledges, and the practice of forestry
- (2009) Louise Fortmann et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH
- Local Participation in Natural Resource Monitoring: a Characterization of Approaches
- (2008) FINN DANIELSEN et al. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started