4.7 Article

Microdosing of scopolamine as a cognitive stress test: Rationale and test of a very low dose in an at-risk cohort of older adults

Journal

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages 262-267

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.01.009

Keywords

Alzheimer disease; Preclinical Alzheimer's disease; Early detection; Cholinergic; Cognition; Biomarkers; Diagnosis; Anticholinergic drugs; Scopolamine; beta-Amyloid protein

Funding

  1. Pfizer, Inc.
  2. Clinical Research Center of the Lifespan Hospital System (Providence, RI)
  3. Ximedica, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Abnormal beta-amyloid (A beta) is associated with deleterious changes in central acetylcholinergic tone in the very early stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD), which may be unmasked by a cholinergic antagonist. We aimed to establish an optimal microdose of scopolamine for the development of a cognitive stress test. Methods: Healthy older adults (n = 26, aged 55-75 years) with two risk factors for AD, but with low cortical A beta burden, completed the Groton Maze Learning Test (GMLT) at baseline and then received scopolamine (0.20 mg subcutaneously). Participants were reassessed at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 8 hours postinjection. Results: There were significant differences, of a moderate magnitude, in performance between baseline and 3 hours postinjection for total errors, rule break errors, and the GMLT composite (d approximate to 0.50) that were all unrelated to body mass. Conclusions: A very low dose of scopolamine leads to reliable cognitive impairment at 3 hours postdose (T-max) and full cognitive recovery within 5 hours, supporting its use as a prognostic test paradigm to identify individuals with potential preclinical AD. This paradigm is being implemented in a larger cohort of healthy adults, with high or low A beta, to identify pharmacodynamic differences between groups. (C) 2014 The Alzheimer's Association. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available