Journal
ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages 104-109Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2009.12.005
Keywords
Alzheimer disease; Amyloid; Autopsy; Biochemical markers; Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease; Frontotemporal dementia; Lewy body disease; Neuropathology; Tau; Vascular dementia
Categories
Funding
- Trolle-Wachtmeister foundation
- Swedish Dementia foundation
- Odenius foundation
- Region Skane
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: Clinical dementia diagnoses are not always consistent with neuropathological findings. As correct diagnosis is important for treatment and care, new diagnostic possibilities for dementia are in demand. Cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers should ideally be able to identify ongoing processes in the brain, but need to be further compared with neuropathological findings for evaluation of their diagnostic validity. Methods: This study included 43 patients with a clinical dementia disorder. All patients were neuropathologically examined at the University Hospital in Lund, Sweden, during the years 2001-2008, and all had a lumbar puncture carried out as part of the clinical investigation during the time of cognitive impairment. Results: Of eight patients, five with Alzheimer's disease had elevated total tau protein (T-tau) and decreased amyloid beta 1-42 protein (A beta 42), while both values for the other three patients were normal. Slightly elevated T-tau and/or decreased A beta 42 were also seen in several patients with other dementia diagnoses such as Lewy body disease, frontotemporal lobar degeneration and vascular dementia. Furthermore, T-tau levels did not differ markedly between patients with morphologically tau-positive and tau-negative frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Also, seven of nine patients with Creutzfeldt-Jacob disease exhibited pronounced elevation in T-tau concentration. Conclusion: From this rather limited study, being the first of its kind in Sweden, we may conclude that there is no perfect concordance between cerebrospinal fluid biomarker levels and pathological findings, which should be taken into account in the clinical diagnostic setting. (C) 2010 The Alzheimer's Association. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available