Journal
ALZHEIMER DISEASE & ASSOCIATED DISORDERS
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 86-93Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e3181630b5c
Keywords
dementia; self-report; informant rating; observational assessments; pain assessment comparison
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Persons with dementia have difficulty communicating, which has led to the underdetection and undertreatment of pain in this population. In this paper, we compare pain assessments using 3 different measurement types: self-report, informant rating, and observational assessments. Participants were 153 nursing home residents from 4 nursing homes. Four different self-report assessments were compared with 3 observational scales and 2 informant-based assessments, which included 3 summary rating scales. Only 60% of participants were able to complete atleast 1 of the self-report assessments. The strongest correlations between assessments were found among instruments of the same type, that is, among the different self-report measures, among the different observational measures, between the 2 informant rating questionnaires, and among the 3 informant rating summary questions. Our results show that the different formats of pain assessments resulted in somewhat overlapping results, yet the differences were much larger than those obtained from different assessments within the same format type. The results reraise the questions of what pain is in this population, and whether the new assessments aimed to uncover such pain have targeted the correct construct. Results suggest that a multimethod type assessment may be needed to effectively manage pain.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available