4.6 Article

Bidirectional association between the risk of comorbidities and the diagnosis of retinal vein occlusion in an elderly population: A nationwide population-based study

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 178, Issue -, Pages 256-261

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.10.110

Keywords

Elderly; Retinal vein occlusion; Major adverse cardiac events

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the second most common retinal vascular disease, with peak incidence at 70 years of age. However, the bidirectional association between the risk of comorbidities and the diagnosis of RVO in this population is uncertain. Methods: A population-based cohort of 1,784,960 patients 70 years of age and older retrieved from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database between 2000 and 2010. Risks of comorbidities were assessed 5 years before and after the diagnosis of RVO. Results: In our study, 3393 subjects had central RVO (CRVO) and 6688 subjects had branch RVO (BRVO). Before the diagnosis of RVO, patients showed increased risks for the following comorbidities: hypertension (odds ratio [OR] = 1.83, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.74-1.93), dyslipidemia (OR = 1.29, [1.23-1.35]), DM (OR = 1.29, [1.23-1.35]), liver disease (OR = 1.22, [1.16-1.29]), renal disease (OR = 1.30, [1.23-1.37]), and cerebrovascular disease (OR = 1.16, [1.11-1.21]). After the diagnosis of RVO, patients were at greater risk of developing DM (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] = 1.12, [1.06-1.19]), PAD (AHR = 1.17, [1.08-1.27]), and MACE (AHR = 1.35, [1.25-1.46]); however, the risk of all-cause mortality was unchanged. Elderly patients with CRVO had a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality (AHR = 1.09, [1.02-1.17]), whereas patients with BRVO showed no significant differences in mortality. Conclusion: This study suggests bidirectional association between the risk of comorbidities and the diagnosis of RVO in an elderly population. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available