4.6 Review

Environmental exposures and asthma morbidity in children living in urban neighborhoods

Journal

ALLERGY
Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages 553-558

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/all.12361

Keywords

childhood asthma; mouse allergen; indoor pollutants; indoor allergens; folate

Funding

  1. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [P50ES015903, P01ES018176]
  2. Environmental Protection Agency [R832139]
  3. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [R01AI070630, U01AI083238]
  4. EPA [R832139, 908913] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A substantial disparity in asthma prevalence and morbidity among urban children compared with their nonurban counterparts has been recognized for more than two decades. Because of the nature of urban neighborhoods, pest allergens, such as cockroach and mouse, are present in high concentrations in US urban housing and have both repeatedly been linked to asthma morbidity in sensitized children. In addition, there is a growing body of evidence demonstrating that concentrations of many pollutants are higher indoors than outdoors in both US and European urban communities and that exposures to indoor pollutants such as particulate matter (PM) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) are independently associated with symptoms in children with asthma. Although environmental interventions are challenging to implement, when they reduce relevant indoor allergen and pollutant exposures, they are associated with clear improvements in asthma. Other modifiable risk factors in urban childhood asthma that have emerged include dietary and nutritional factors. Overweight and obese children, for example, may be more susceptible to the pulmonary effects of pollutant exposure. Insufficiency of vitamin D and folate has also emerged as modifiable risk factors for asthma morbidity in children. The identification of these modifiable risk factors for urban childhood asthma morbidity offers a ripe opportunity for intervention.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available