4.6 Article

Impact of mometasone furoate nasal spray on individual ocular symptoms of allergic rhinitis: a meta-analysis

Journal

ALLERGY
Volume 66, Issue 5, Pages 686-693

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2010.02543.x

Keywords

ocular allergy; pollens; rhinitis

Funding

  1. Schering Corp.
  2. Merck Co.
  3. Schering-Plough
  4. Otsuka
  5. Novartis
  6. Astellas
  7. Sepracor
  8. Allergan
  9. (Lev Pharma) Viro-Pharm
  10. Dyax
  11. A. Menarini
  12. Alcon
  13. Alk-Abello
  14. Almirall
  15. Anallergo
  16. AstraZeneca
  17. Biofutura Pharma
  18. Boehringer Ingelheim
  19. Chiesi Farmaceutici
  20. GlaxoSmithKline
  21. Lofarma
  22. Merck Sharp Dohme
  23. Nycomed
  24. Pfizer
  25. Phadia
  26. SigmaTau
  27. Stallergenes
  28. UCB Pharma
  29. Uriach
  30. Valeas

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P>Background: Intranasal corticosteroids (INSs) are a mainstay of treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR) nasal symptoms. The INS mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) has well-documented efficacy and safety for the treatment and prophylaxis of nasal symptoms of seasonal AR (SAR) and for the treatment of nasal symptoms of perennial AR (PAR). Increasing interest has focused on whether INSs, including MFNS, may have beneficial effects on the ocular symptoms frequently associated with AR. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of 10 randomized, placebo-controlled trials of the efficacy of MFNS 200 mcg daily in relieving ocular allergy symptoms, including itching/burning, redness, and tearing/watering in both SAR and PAR. Four PAR studies and six SAR studies are included in the analysis. A fixed-effect inverse variance model was used to calculate weighted mean differences, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each comparison, and a combined overall treatment effect (Z) with P-value. Results: In both analyses of SAR and PAR studies, including 3132 patients, all individual ocular symptoms were reduced in patients treated with MFNS. Overall treatment effect was significant for all three individual ocular symptoms in the SAR studies (Z = 9.18 for tearing, Z = 10.15 for itching, and Z = 8.88 for redness; P < 0.00001 for all) and in the PAR studies (Z = 5.94, P < 0.00001 for tearing; Z = 2.43, P = 0.02 for itching; and Z = 2.42, P = 0.02 for redness). Conclusions: Our findings add to the growing body of literature supporting the positive class effect of INSs, including MFNS, on ocular symptoms associated with SAR and PAR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available