4.7 Review

Biological relevance of Hsp90-binding immunophilins in cancer development and treatment

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 138, Issue 4, Pages 797-808

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29509

Keywords

FKBP51; FKBP52; FKBP38; FKBPL; NF-kappa B; steroid receptor

Categories

Funding

  1. Universidad de Buenos Aires [UBACYT-GC-0020130100318BA]
  2. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica [PICT 2011-1715]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Immunophilins are a family of intracellular receptors for immunosuppressive drugs. Those immunophilins that are related to immunosuppression are the smallest proteins of the family, i.e., FKBP12 and CyPA, whereas the other members of the family have higher molecular weight because the show additional domains to the drug-binding site. Among these extra domains, the TPR-domain is perhaps the most relevant because it permits the interaction of high molecular weight immunophilins with the 90-kDa heat-shock protein, Hsp90. This essential molecular chaperone regulates the biological function of several protein-kinases, oncogenes, protein phosphatases, transcription factors and cofactors. Hsp90-binding immunophilins where first characterized due to their association with steroid receptors. They regulate the cytoplasmic transport and the subcellular localization of these and other Hsp90 client proteins, as well as transcriptional activity, cell proliferation, cell differentiation and apoptosis. Hsp90-binding immunophilins are frequently overexpressed in several types of cancers and play a key role in cell survival. In this article we analyze the most important biological actions of the best characterized Hsp90-binding immunophilins in both steroid receptor function and cancer development and discuss the potential use of these immunophilins for therapeutic purposes as potential targets of specific small molecules.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available