4.7 Article

Systematic review: antibodies and anti-TNF-α levels in inflammatory bowel disease

Journal

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 35, Issue 9, Pages 971-986

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2012.05057.x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MSD
  2. Abbott

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background The associations between clinical efficacy and infusion reactions with anti-TNF-alpha drug levels and the presence of antibodies against the drug have been described. However, the clinical utility of these tests in routine clinical practice remains unclear. Aims To examine the clinical significance of the development of antibodies against anti-TNF-alpha drugs and the relationship between the efficacy of these drugs and their serum levels. We also studied the clinical utility of testing for anti-TNF-alpha antibodies and measuring drug serum levels to optimise treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) receiving these agents. Methods A systematic review was undertaken based on electronic searches of the PubMed database from the earliest record to February 2012. The reference lists of all relevant articles and abstracts from meetings were also consulted. Results We observed a close relationship between trough levels of anti-TNF-alpha drug and maintenance of response to these drugs. The role of antibodies in loss of response seems to be limited to their effect favouring the clearance of the drug. The risk of infusion reactions, but not of delayed hypersensitivity reactions, is higher in patients with antibodies against the anti-TNF-alpha drug. Testing anti-TNF-alpha drug and antibody levels, together with clinical and endoscopic or radiological assessment, seems useful when attempting to optimise therapy and prevent inappropriate management of IBD patients. Conclusion Measurement of serum anti-TNF-alpha trough levels and antibody titres could prove useful in therapeutic drug monitoring in IBD patients treated with anti-TNF-alpha agents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available