4.7 Review

Systematic review: the role of tacrolimus in the management of Crohn's disease

Journal

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 34, Issue 11-12, Pages 1282-1294

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04873.x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Several published studies have evaluated the efficacy of tacrolimus in the management of Crohns disease with variable conclusions. Aim To review systematically the evidence examining the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus in treating Crohns disease. Methods The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (PUBMED) and EMBASE (1984 to January 2011) were searched. Also, references from selected articles were examined. Case series (five or more patients), cohort and randomised controlled trials were eligible for inclusion, incorporating oral, intravenous or topical tacrolimus therapy. The primary outcome was induction of remission of active Crohns disease. Results Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria which included 163 patients, of which 127 received tacrolimus therapy. In patients with luminal Crohns disease, the crude pooled remission rate for tacrolimus was 44.3% (range, 769%) and the crude pooled response rate was 37.1% (range, 1457%). For patients with perianal disease using systemic tacrolimus, crude pooled remission rate was 28.6% (range, 064%) and crude pooled response rate was 38.8% (range, 057%). Combining data from two studies using topical tacrolimus, 35.7% of patients achieved remission and 28.6% partial response. Nonserious adverse effects are common, particularly tremor, paraesthesia and headache. Reversible nephrotoxity occurred in 16% of patients. Conclusions The current evidence; although of a poor quality, appears to support the use of tacrolimus in Crohns disease. High quality randomised controlled trials are needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available