4.7 Article

Direct N2O emissions following transition from conventional till to no-till in a cover cropped Mediterranean vineyard (Vitis vinifera)

Journal

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT
Volume 144, Issue 1, Pages 423-428

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2011.11.001

Keywords

Nitrous oxide; Tillage; Cover crop; Management practices; Vineyard

Funding

  1. California Energy Commission

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Knowing underlying practices for current greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is a necessary precursor for developing best management practices aimed at reducing N2O emissions. The effect of no-till management on nitrous oxide (N2O), a potent greenhouse gas, remains largely unclear, especially in perennial agroecosystems. The objective of this study was to compare direct N2O emissions associated with management events in a cover-cropped Mediterranean vineyard under conventional tillage (CT) versus no-till (NT) practices. This study took place in a wine grape vineyard over one full growing season, with a focus on the seven to ten days following vineyard floor management and precipitation events. Cumulative N2O emissions in the NT system were greater under both the vine and the tractor row compared to CT, with 0.15 +/- 0.026 kg N2O-N ha(-1) growing season(-1) emitted from the CT vine compared to 0.22 +/- 0.032 kg N2O-N ha(-1) growing season(-1) emitted from the NT vine and 0.13 +/- 0.048 kg N2O-N ha(-1) growing season(-1) emitted from the CT row compared to 0.19 +/- 0.019 kg N2O-N ha(-1) growing season(-1) from the NT row. Yet these variations were not significant, indicating no differences in seasonal N2O emissions following conversion from CT to NT compared to long-term CT management. Individual management events such as fertilization and cover cropping, however, had a major impact on seasonal emissions, indicating that management events play a critical role in N2O emission patterns. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available