4.7 Article

Modeling soil organic carbon stocks and changes in a Nepalese watershed

Journal

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT
Volume 132, Issue 1-2, Pages 91-97

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2009.03.003

Keywords

Century C model; Climate change; Land use change; Mountain watershed; Nepal; SOC pool

Funding

  1. Research Council of Norway [141343/730]
  2. Natural Resources Ecology Laboratory (NREL)
  3. Colorado State University
  4. Research Council of Norway
  5. Norwegian State Education Loan Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Land use, land use change and forestry activities play an important role in determining whether soil is a sink or source of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2). The effects of land use change on greenhouse gases and climate change are receiving greater attention in many developing countries. We simulated changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) pool over 100 years (1950-2050) under managed dense Shorea forest (DS), rainfed upland (Bari) and irrigated low land (Khet) of Pokhare Khola, a mid-hill watershed of Nepal, using the Century model. The model was calibrated and parameterized on the basis of biophysical and weather data of the watershed and field measurements made in September/October 2004. Historic C pool data were calculated using the IPCC inventory guidelines for the year 1976 and 1989. The Century model performed well in representing the effects of various land management systems on SOC in the Pokhare Khola watershed. There was a dramatic loss of SOC following the removal of tree biomass and conversion to agriculture. However, it was shown that partial recovery of lost SOC is possible through better forest management, especially if erosion is abated. In the cultivated land we found better recovery by addition of farm yard manure and fertilizer. In all the land use systems, the SOC recovery was lower under the climate change scenario than under prevailing climate. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available