4.7 Article

Hatching new ideas about herb pastures: Learning together in a community of New Zealand farmers and agricultural scientists

Journal

AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS
Volume 125, Issue -, Pages 63-73

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2013.12.002

Keywords

Agriculture; Pastoral farmers; Learning; Innovation; Community of practice; Adoption

Funding

  1. Massey University
  2. Gravida (the National Research Centre for Growth and Development)
  3. C Alma Baker Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Historically, farmers are slow to adopt new and evidence-based pastoral farming practices. While there is a long history of research on extension and technology transfer to farmers, a fresh and innovative approach is needed to ensure that farmers learn about, adopt and adapt highly effective technologies. Little is known about how pastoral farmers learn about new evidence-based ideas - insights that need to inform the design of new models of extension. An 18-month pilot study brought together agricultural scientists and social scientists to investigate how farmers learn and effective ways to support their learning. An innovative participatory programme was designed for 18 farmers to promote improved management practices of herb-mix pastures containing chicory, plantain and red and white clover. Results showed that farmers' learning was promoted when they: (1) participated in a learning community with agricultural scientists, (2) made connections between evidence-based ideas and their own farming systems, (3) were interested in the learning focus and became part of a shared inquiry, and (4) revisited important concepts and engaged in a range of multi-sensorial activities that were aligned to important pastoral outcomes. These findings are examined against contemporary educational theories to suggest a set of principles to develop educationally-informed and innovative approaches to farmer learning. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved,

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available