4.7 Article

Simultaneous measurements of above and below canopy ozone fluxes help partitioning ozone deposition between its various sinks in a Mediterranean Oak Forest

Journal

AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
Volume 198, Issue -, Pages 181-191

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.08.014

Keywords

Ozone fluxes; Eddy covariance measurements; Non-stomatal sink; Resistance modelling; Holm Oak Forest; Quercus ilex

Funding

  1. European Project EXPLO3RVOC (FP7-PEOPLE-CIG) [321711]
  2. European Project FO3REST [LIFE10 ENV/FR/208]
  3. European Project ECLAIRE (FP7-ENV)
  4. European Project COST action GREENINURB [FP1204]
  5. General Secretariat of the Presidency of Italian Republic
  6. FP7 INFRA 13 project ExpeER [262060]
  7. Access to Research Infrastructures activity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Castelporziano Estate is a coastal forest 25 km from downtown Rome. It is an ideal site to study interactions between Mediterranean forest ecosystems and a polluted atmosphere. Two eddy covariance systems were used to simultaneously measure water vapour and ozone fluxes above and below a canopy of Holm Oak (Quercus ilex). Additional measurements of environmental parameters allowed to calculate stomatal ozone fluxes in order to parameterize atmospheric models and new algorithms for discriminating ozone deposition into its three more significant sinks: soil, stomata, and cuticles. Results showed that stomata explained almost the totality of ozone fluxes during the winter season, and <60% during the warm seasons under condition of drought stress. Soils removed up to 30% of ozone, suggesting the importance of this sink in this forest ecosystem. This study spanning all seasons over a 2-year period advanced our understanding about the contribution of a representative Mediterranean Oak forest to biosphere-atmosphere exchange. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available