4.7 Article

Shorter telomere length is linked to brain atrophy and white matter hyperintensities

Journal

AGE AND AGEING
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages 212-217

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/aft172

Keywords

brain atrophy; older people; telomere length; white matter hyperintensities

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council [2006-4472, 2009-5269, 2009-3413, 345-2003-3883, 315-2004-6977]
  2. Medical Faculty, Umea University
  3. County Council of Vasterbotten, Sweden
  4. County Council of Norrbotten, Sweden
  5. Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation
  6. Swedish Council for Planning and Coordination of Research
  7. Swedish Council for Research in the Humanities and Social Sciences
  8. Swedish Council for Social Research
  9. European Union Directorate General XII

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: leukocyte telomere length (TL) is considered a marker of biological aging. Several studies have investigated the link between leukocyte TL and aging-associated functional attributes of the brain, but no prior study has investigated whether TL can be linked to brain atrophy and white matter hyperintensities (WMHs); two prominent structural manifestations of brain aging. Methods: we investigated whether leukocyte TL was related to brain atrophy and WMHs in a sample of 102 non-demented individuals aged 64-75 years. Results: shorter TL was related to greater degree of subcortical atrophy (beta = -0.217, P = 0.034), but not to cortical atrophy. Furthermore, TL was 371 bp shorter (P = 0.041) in participants exhibiting subcortical WMHs, and 552 bp shorter (P = 0.009) in older participants exhibiting periventricular WMHs. Conclusion: this study provides the first evidence of leukocyte TL being associated with cerebral subcortical atrophy and WMHs, lending further support to the concept of TL as a marker of biological aging, and in particular that of the aging brain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available