4.4 Article

Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection in Patients with Bilateral Trapezius Hypertrophy

Journal

AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages 1664-1671

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00266-018-1201-3

Keywords

Bilateral trapezius hypertrophy; Botulinum toxin type A; Upper trapezius

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To evaluate aesthetic outcomes in patients with bilateral trapezius hypertrophy treated by botulinum toxin type A (BTxA) injection for aesthetic reconstruction of the upper trapezius. Methods From May 2015 to May 2016, 30 women with a short neck shape resulting from bilateral trapezius hypertrophy were treated with botulinum toxin type A (BTxA) injection at the most affected area of the upper trapezius. Pre- and postoperative values of S-ACDF (irregularly shaped area of the four points A, C, D, and F) and S-ACDE (irregularly shaped area of the four points A, C, D, and E), responses to patients' and doctors' Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) questionnaires for neck aesthetic assessment, as well as reported adverse events, were recorded and analyzed. Results Duration of follow-up ranged from 4 to 12 months. Subjects experienced non-severe adverse events and complete recovery after a single BTxA injection. In patients' GAIS questionnaires, very much improved accounted for 53%, much improved accounted for 13%, and improved accounted for 27%. In doctors' GAIS questionnaires, very much improved accounted for 27%, much improved accounted for 33%, improved accounted for 33%, and no change accounted for 7%. The overall degree of improvement was high. Statistically significant differences were observed with respect to the very much improved response to GAIS questionnaires between patients and doctors (P = 0.035). Conclusion A single injection of BTxA for aesthetic reconstruction of the upper trapezius is safe and effective in patients with bilateral trapezius hypertrophy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available