4.7 Article

Bifunctional Squaramide Catalysts with the Same Absolute Chirality for the Diastereodivergent Access to Densely Functionalised Cyclohexanes through Enantioselective Domino Reactions. Synthesis and Mechanistic Studies

Journal

ADVANCED SYNTHESIS & CATALYSIS
Volume 356, Issue 17, Pages 3627-3648

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adsc.201400502

Keywords

asymmetric catalysis; domino reactions; hydrogen bonds; organocatalysis; reaction mechanism

Funding

  1. Spanish MINECO (FPI fellowship) [CTQ2011-22790]
  2. Spanish MINECO (Juan de la Cierva contract)
  3. Basque Government [IT328-10]
  4. UPV/EHU [UFI QOSYC 11/22, EHUA12/09]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have developed a procedure for the stereoselective and diastereodivergent synthesis of densely functionalised cyclohexanes containing four stereocentres through an asymmetric Michael-initiated ring closure (MIRC) cascade reaction employing hydrogen-bond catalysis, which is able to prepare adducts with different absolute configurations starting from the same starting materials. The overall process involves a highly diastereo- and enantioselective Michael/Henry cascade reaction between a wide range of nitroalkenes and alpha-nitro-delta-oxo esters, allowing access to different diastereoisomers of the final adduct by introducing subtle changes in the general (R,R)-configured bifunctional tertiary amine/squaramide catalyst structure. Moreover, this methodology is also amenable to a three-component one-pot procedure, leading to the formation of the same adducts with very good results directly from commercially available reagents, on a multigram scale, and employing a very low catalyst loading. Furthermore, a detailed experimental and computational study is described which shows the origin of the diastereodivergent behaviour of these structurally similar catalysts and the nature of the substrate-catalyst interaction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available