4.2 Article

Relationship between Esophageal Cardiac Glands and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Journal

INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages 91-96

Publisher

JAPAN SOC INTERNAL MEDICINE
DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.54.3179

Keywords

esophageal cardiac gland; reflux esophagitis; GERD; QUEST; endoscopy

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25460928] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective The role of esophageal cardiac glands has not been fully determined. This study was performed to clarify the protective role of esophageal cardiac glands against the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Methods The subjects included 2,656 Japanese individuals who visited our institution for a detailed medical checkup. GERD symptoms were assessed using the Japanese version of the Carlsson-Dent self-administered questionnaire (QUEST) and an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy examination in each subject. The presence of reflux esophagitis, size of diaphragmatic hiatus, degree of gastric mucosal atrophy and existence of visible esophageal cardiac glands in the distal esophagus, based on the detection of yellowish elevated areas, were determined using endoscopy. Results Esophageal cardiac glands were observed in 355 cases (13.4%). Reflux esophagitis was significantly less frequent in the cases with esophageal cardiac glands than in those without. The esophageal cardiac glands were mainly located on the left-posterior side of the esophageal wall of the distal esophagus. A multiple regression analysis showed that the presence of esophageal cardiac glands was an independent factor for preventing reflux esophagitis. On the other hand, the existence of these glands did not correlate with the presence of GERD symptoms (QUEST score of 6 or more). Conclusion The presence of visible esophageal cardiac glands may have a protective role against the development of reflux esophagitis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available