4.3 Article

Influence of gonadal hormones on the behavioral effects of intermittent hypoxia in mice

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00379.2014

Keywords

obstructive sleep apnea; intermittent hypoxia; hormones; behavior

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research Grant [T32 DE014320]
  2. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Grant [P30 NS045758]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is characterized by repetitive upper airway obstruction resulting in cyclic intermittent hypoxia (IH) during sleep in affected individuals. OSA occurs more frequently in postmenopausal than premenopausal women and the severity of OSA increases after menopause. Gonadal hormones can influence brain and behavior; testosterone and estrogens in particular can enhance spatial learning and memory. We hypothesized that estrogens may protect mice from IH-induced hippocampal morphological and behavioral changes. To test this hypothesis we exposed intact or gonadectomized male and female mice to room air or IH [15 cycles/h, 8 h/day, fraction of inspired oxygen (F-IO2) nadir of 5%] for a total of 30 days. During the final 4 days of IH, mice were tested for anxiety-and depressive-like behaviors. After cessation of IH exposure mice were tested on the Barnes maze and passive avoidance tests to assess learning and memory. Ovariectomy paired with IH treatment, impaired spatial learning and memory compared to all other female groups. Intact male mice receiving IH treatment also had impaired learning and memory compared with intact or castrated male mice exposed to room air. Learning and memory changes were mirrored by changes in basilar dendritic length of the CA1 region of the hippocampus. These data suggest that estrogens provide protection against IH-induced deficits, whereas androgens partially exacerbate IH-induced deficits on learning and memory.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available