4.4 Article

Clinical Care Providers' Perspectives on Body Size and Weight Management Among Long-Term Cancer Survivors

Journal

INTEGRATIVE CANCER THERAPIES
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 240-248

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1534735415572882

Keywords

body size; weight management; cancer survivors; clinicians; health communication

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (National Cancer Institute and Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences) Research Grant [1R21CA152789]
  2. National Institutes of Health, National Research Service Award [T32 CA009314]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. To examine clinical care providers' perspectives on cancer survivors' body size and weight management. Study Design. In-depth, semi-structured, qualitative interviews. Methods. Interviews were conducted with 33 providers (eg. oncologists, surgeons, primary care providers, nurses, dietitians) across academic and community clinical settings. They were transcribed, coded, and analyzed thematically using constant comparative analysis. Results. Providers conceptualized weight in relation to acute treatment, cancer outcomes, or overall health/comorbidities. These patterns were reflected in their reported framing of weight discussions, although providers indicated that they counsel patients on weight to varying extents. Perspectives differed based on professional roles and patient populations. Providers reported that survivors are motivated to lose weight, particularly due to comorbidity concerns, but face numerous barriers to doing so. Conclusion. Providers described survivor-level and capacity-level factors influencing survivors' weight management. Differences by provider type highlighted the role of provider knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs in clinical encounters. Opportunities for research and intervention include developing and disseminating evidence-based clinical resources for weight management among cancer survivors, addressing capacity barriers, and exploring communication strategies at interpersonal and population levels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available