4.1 Article

Latitudinal variation of morphological characteristics in the swallowtail Sericinus montelus Gray, 1798 (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae)

Journal

ACTA ZOOLOGICA
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages 242-252

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/azo.12072

Keywords

adaptation; body size; colour; evolution; latitudinal variation

Funding

  1. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-12-0864]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2012ZYTS044, 2013PY046]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Patterns of latitudinal variation in the phenotype or genotype of an organism may provide evidence for natural selection. In this study, we investigated seven populations of swallowtail Sericinus montelus Gray, 1798 (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae), a non-migratory species, to explore the latitudinal variation of morphological characteristics in adults. The results showed that body size and the development of dark pigmentation on wings in this species responded strongly to latitude. The body size of both male and female adult of S.montelus was negatively correlated with latitude. These findings provided solid evidence to support the converse Bergmann's rule. We considered that the observed variation in morphological characteristics was most likely mediated by the seasonal length and thermoperiod to adapt to different latitudinal environment (e.g. shortened developmental time of immature stages for smaller body size at higher latitude). Moreover, the tendency towards progressively darker colour patterns (only in adult males) at increasingly low latitudes was consistent with Gloger's rule. We suggested that the observed colour variation was most likely associated with thermoregulation. Slight variation in the morphology of the W-shaped stripe on the forewing of adult females was also found, and we presumed that the functions of sexual preferences, mimicry and thermoregulation might be involved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available