4.2 Article

Detection of hemorrhagic hypointense foci in radiation injury region using susceptibility-weighted imaging

Journal

ACTA RADIOLOGICA
Volume 52, Issue 1, Pages 115-119

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1258/ar.2010.100220

Keywords

Susceptibility-weighted imaging; susceptibility effect; brain; glioma; radiation injury; hemorrhage

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30970796]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI), a novel, highly sensitive 3D gradient echo MR imaging technique, is used to detect hemorrhage. Purpose: To evaluate SWI at 3.0T for detection and visualization of hemorrhage at radiation injury region after radiotherapy for brain glioma. Material and Methods: In 16 patients who had radiation injury in the vicinity of the previously resected and irradiated high-grade brain glioma, SWI examinations were performed on a 3T MR scanner. The presence of intralesional hypointense foci on SWI was evaluated by two neuroradiologists. Frequency of these foci on SWI was assessed and the number of these foci was counted. Diagnosis of radiation injury was assigned by means of histopathology or follow-up MR image. Results: In all 16 cases with cerebral radiation injury, nine were verified by means of histopathologic examination, seven by follow-up image. While in one patient quality of SWI was poor, in all remaining patients diagnostic-quality SWI was obtained. The intralesional hypointense foci were detected in 12 of 15 patients. These hypointense foci were nodular, angular, or tubular regions of low signal intensity on SWI. The distribution of these foci was diffusive (n = 5) or scattered (n = 7). Number of these foci per cm(2) on SWI was 7.25 +/- 3.67. Conclusion: SWI is a novel and promising technique for evaluation of hemorrhage at radiation injury regions in the vicinity of the previously treated gliomas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available