4.5 Article

Incident subjective memory complaints and the risk of subsequent dementia

Journal

ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA
Volume 131, Issue 4, Pages 290-296

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acps.12328

Keywords

dementia; outcome; old-age; epidemiology; early intervention

Categories

Funding

  1. Interdisciplinary Centre for Clinical Research Leipzig [C07]
  2. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01GI431, 01GI0714, 01GY1322A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveIn this study, we aimed to analyze the association between newincidentsubjective memory complaints (SMC) and risk of subsequent dementia in a general population sample aged 75+years. MethodData were derived from follow-up (FUP) waves I-V of the population-based Leipzig Longitudinal Study of the Aged (LEILA75+). We used the Kaplan-Meier survival method to estimate dementia-free survival times of individuals with and without incident SMC and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to assess the association between incident SMC and risk of subsequent dementia, controlled for covariates. ResultsOf 443 non-demented individuals, 58 (13.1%) developed dementia during a subsequent 5.4-year follow-up period. Participants with incident SMC showed a significantly higher progression to dementia (18.5% vs. 10.0%; P=0.010) and a significantly shorter mean dementia-free survival time than those without (6.2 vs. 6.8years; P=0.008). The association between incident SMC and risk of subsequent dementia remained significant in the multivariable Cox analysis (adjusted hazard ratio=1.8; P=0.028). ConclusionOur findings suggest higher progression to dementia and shorter dementia-free survival in older individuals with incident SMC. These findings support the notion that such subjective complaints should be taken seriously in clinical practice as possible early indicators of incipient dementia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available