4.5 Article

Is psychotic disorder associated with increased levels of craving for cannabis? An Experience Sampling study

Journal

ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA
Volume 128, Issue 6, Pages 448-456

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/acps.12078

Keywords

cannabis use; craving for cannabis; OCDUS; psychotic disorder; schizophrenia; experience sampling method

Categories

Funding

  1. NWO, the Dutch Council for Scientific Research (ZonMW VENI grant)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveAlthough cannabis use among individuals with psychotic disorder is considerable, little is known about patterns of use and factors contributing to continuation of use. Therefore, we investigated craving in relation to cannabis use in patients with psychotic disorder and healthy controls. MethodThe study included 58 patients with non-affective psychotic disorder and 63 healthy controls; all were frequent cannabis users. Craving was assessed with the Obsessive Compulsive Drug Use Scale (OCDUS) for cannabis, as well as in daily life using the Experience Sampling Method (ESM). ResultsPatients scored higher on the OCDUS (B=1.18, P=0.022), but did not differ from controls in ESM indices of craving (all P>0.05). In daily life, ESM craving predicted cannabis use and this was stronger in controls ((2)=4.5, P=0.033; B-controls=0.08, P<0.001; B-patients=0.06, P<0.001). In both groups ESM craving was predicted by negative affect, paranoia, and hallucinations (B-negativeaffect=0.12, P=0.009; B-paranoia=0.13, P=0.013; B-hallucinations=0.13, P=0.028), and followed by an increase in negative affect at non-cannabis-using moments (B=0.03, P=0.002). ConclusionThe temporal dynamics of craving as well as craving intensity in daily life appear to be similar in patients and controls. Further research is needed to elucidate the inconsistencies between cross-sectional and daily-life measures of craving in psychosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available