4.5 Article

The effect of person-centred communication on parental stress in a NICU: a randomized clinical trial

Journal

ACTA PAEDIATRICA
Volume 102, Issue 12, Pages 1130-1136

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apa.12404

Keywords

Effective communication; Family-centred care; Neonatal intensive care; Parental stress; Parent-nurse intervention

Categories

Funding

  1. Lundbeck Foundation [FP/30/2009, FP/ 13/2010, FP/55/2011]
  2. Novonordisk Foundation
  3. Danish Nurses Organization Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimTo investigate the effect of the Guided Family-Centred Care intervention, developed by the lead author, on parental stress in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). MethodsParents (n=134) of infants born 34weeks gestational age were randomly assigned to a standard care group (n=60) or intervention group (n=74) between April 2011 and August 2012. Guided Family-Centred Care components used were as follows: scheduled nurse-parent dialogues, semi-structured reflection sheets and person-centred communication. Parental stress was assessed at discharge using parent-reported outcomes on the Nurse Parent Support Tool and the Parental Stressor Scale: Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. ResultsThe total stress scores reported by parents did not vary significantly between the intervention and standard groups, with a mean (SD) of 2.70 (0.67) versus 2.84 (0.71), respectively. However, the confidence interval included the prespecified clinical significance level. Subscale and Nurse Parent Support Tool scores did not differ between the groups. Overall, mothers reported more stress than fathers (p<0.001). ConclusionOur study was unable to demonstrate the effect of person-centred communication using the Guided Family-Centred Care intervention. It may be necessary to replicate the design to address the risk of contamination and add instruments sensitive to human interaction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available