4.4 Article

Pseudoexfoliation and Alzheimer's disease: a population-based 30-year follow-up study

Journal

ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA
Volume 92, Issue 4, Pages 355-358

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/aos.12184

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; capsular glaucoma; dementia; epidemiology; exfoliation syndrome; open-angle glaucoma; pseudoexfoliation; risk factor

Categories

Funding

  1. Swedish Medical Research Council
  2. Crown Princess Margaretha's Foundation for the Visually Impaired
  3. Glaucoma Research Fund at the Department of Ophthalmology, Uppsala University Hospital
  4. Uppsala County Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To determine the effect of pseudoexfoliation (PEX) on the development of Alzheimer's disease (AD) in a population in which PEX is a common finding. The relationship between open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and AD was also studied. Methods: Predictors of incident AD, including mixed and unspecified dementia, were analysed in a cohort of 679 residents 65-74years of age, examined in a population survey in the municipality of Tierp, Sweden, 1984-1986. To expand the cohort, participants in other studies in Tierp were enrolled. In this way, the cohort embraced 1123 people, representing more than 15700 person-years at risk. Medical records were reviewed to identify subjects diagnosed with dementia. Those with a follow-up time shorter than 2years were excluded from the study. Results: By the conclusion of the study, in December 2011, 174 new cases of AD, including mixed and unspecified dementia, had been detected, 41 of whom were affected by PEX at baseline. Higher age and female gender were the only predictors identified. No association between PEX and AD was found (hazard ratio 0.98; 95% confidence interval 0.69-1.40). Newly diagnosed OAG at baseline did not increase the risk (hazard ratio 1.09; 95% confidence interval 0.69-1.74). Conclusion: Pseudoexfoliation is not a predictor of AD. No association was found between OAG and AD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available