Screening for cancer-related distress: When is implementation successful and when is it unsuccessful?
Published 2013 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Screening for cancer-related distress: When is implementation successful and when is it unsuccessful?
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
ACTA ONCOLOGICA
Volume 52, Issue 2, Pages 216-224
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Online
2013-01-16
DOI
10.3109/0284186x.2012.745949
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Distress Management
- (2017) Jimmie C. Holland et al. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
- Short Screening Tools for Cancer-Related Distress: A Review and Diagnostic Validity Meta-Analysis
- (2017) Alex J. Mitchell Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
- Analysis of decisions made in meta-analyses of depression screening and the risk of confirmation bias: A case study
- (2012) Felicity A Goodyear-Smith et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Online screening for distress, the 6th vital sign, in newly diagnosed oncology outpatients: randomised controlled trial of computerised vs personalised triage
- (2012) L E Carlson et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Direct improvement of quality of life using a tailored quality of life diagnosis and therapy pathway: randomised trial in 200 women with breast cancer
- (2012) M Klinkhammer-Schalke et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- How feasible is implementation of distress screening by cancer clinicians in routine clinical care?
- (2012) Alex J. Mitchell et al. CANCER
- Meta-analysis of screening and case finding tools for depression in cancer: Evidence based recommendations for clinical practice on behalf of the Depression in Cancer Care consensus group
- (2012) Alex J. Mitchell et al. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
- Screening for Distress and Unmet Needs in Patients With Cancer: Review and Recommendations
- (2012) Linda E. Carlson et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Meta-Analysis of Efficacy of Interventions for Elevated Depressive Symptoms in Adults Diagnosed With Cancer
- (2012) Stacey L. Hart et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Screening for cancer-related distress: Summary of evidence from tools to programmes
- (2011) Pernille Envold Bidstrup et al. ACTA ONCOLOGICA
- The usefulness and feasibility of a screening instrument to identify psychosocial problems in patients receiving curative radiotherapy: a process evaluation
- (2011) Anna PBM Braeken et al. BMC CANCER
- Rethinking recommendations for screening for depression in primary care
- (2011) B. D. Thombs et al. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL
- Depression Screening and Patient Outcomes in Cancer: A Systematic Review
- (2011) Anna Meijer et al. PLoS One
- Screening for distress and depression in cancer settings: 10 lessons from 40 years of primary-care research
- (2011) Alex J. Mitchell et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
- Usefulness of pharmacist-assisted screening and psychiatric referral program for outpatients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy
- (2011) Tatsuhiko Ito et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
- Educational intervention in cancer outpatient clinics on routine screening for emotional distress: an observational study
- (2011) Luigi Grassi et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
- Does screening for distress efficiently uncover meetable unmet needs in cancer patients?
- (2011) Corinne van Scheppingen et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
- Screening for Distress in Lung and Breast Cancer Outpatients: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- (2010) Linda E. Carlson et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Evaluating the quality of psychosocial care in outpatient medical oncology settings using performance indicators
- (2010) Paul B. Jacobsen et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
- Identification of patient-reported distress by clinical nurse specialists in routine oncology practice: a multicentre UK study
- (2010) Alex J. Mitchell et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
- Does routine psychological screening of newly diagnosed rural cancer patients lead to better patient outcomes? Results of a pilot study
- (2009) Belinda Thewes et al. Australian Journal of Rural Health
- Impact of Two Supportive Care Interventions on Anxiety, Depression, Quality of Life, and Unmet Needs in Patients With Nonlocalized Breast and Colorectal Cancers
- (2009) Afaf Girgis et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Screening for Emotional Distress in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review of Assessment Instruments
- (2009) A. Vodermaier et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Feasibility and usefulness of the ‘Distress Screening Program in Ambulatory Care’ in clinical oncology practice
- (2009) Ken Shimizu et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
- Improving patient outcomes through the routine use of patient-reported data in cancer clinics: future directions
- (2009) T. Luckett et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
- What are the unmet supportive care needs of people with cancer? A systematic review
- (2009) James D. Harrison et al. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
- Use of health-related quality-of-life assessments in daily clinical oncology nursing practice
- (2008) Doranne L. Hilarius et al. CANCER
- Depression Screening and Patient Outcomes in Cardiovascular Care
- (2008) Brett D. Thombs et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Does a Patient-Held Quality-of-Life Diary Benefit Patients With Inoperable Lung Cancer?
- (2008) Moyra E. Mills et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Evaluation of a face-to-face psychosocial screening intervention for cancer patients: Acceptance and effects on quality of life
- (2007) I. Bramsen et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
- Acceptability of common screening methods used to detect distress and related mood disorders—preferences of cancer specialists and non-specialists
- (2007) Alex J. Mitchell et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started