4.3 Article

Niche overlap and species assemblage dynamics in an ageing pasture gradient in north-western France

Journal

ACTA OECOLOGICA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 212-219

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.actao.2011.02.004

Keywords

Grasslands; Assembly rules; Trait-based rules; Species-based rules; Null models; Niche overlap analysis; Gradient analysis

Categories

Funding

  1. Conseil Regional de Haute-Normandie through the GRR SER
  2. GESSOL program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims at describing the mechanisms of earthworm species assemblages in a temperate grassland ageing gradient. Earthworms were sampled by a combination of formaldehyde extraction and hand sorting. Density data were analysed by combining correspondence analysis (CA) and null model analyses of niche overlap patterns and morphological trait dispersion. The first axis of the CA arranged samples according to the pasture ageing gradient and separated pioneer (CA1-) from old pasture (CA1+) species assemblages. The second axis segregated two different assemblages (CA2- and CA2+) that were consistently represented along the ageing gradient and was assumed to represent intra-plot assemblage heterogeneity. Niche overlap according to soil organic C, C:N ratio and root biomass was higher than expected by chance (EBC) in most assemblages, and was higher when calculated for the whole regional species pool than for local assemblages. Morphological dispersion was random or lower than expected by chance for the regional species pool and both CA1- and CA1+, and higher than expected by chance for both CA2- and CA2+. These results indicate that: (1) habitat and dispersal constraints act as filters by allowing only those species with similar prerequisite traits into assemblages; (2) inter-specific competition limit composition in a further step by calling for a minimal level of overdispersion in morphological traits. (C) 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available