4.5 Article

Effects on bone mineral density of a monophasic combined oral contraceptive containing nomegestrol acetate/17β-estradiol in comparison to levonorgestrel/ethinylestradiol

Journal

ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
Volume 91, Issue 11, Pages 1279-1285

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01498.x

Keywords

Bone mineral density; nomegestrol acetate; 17 ss-estradiol; oral contraceptive; levonorgestrel; ethinylestradiol

Funding

  1. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (MSD), a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA)
  2. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (MSD), a subsidiary of Merck Co., Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. To compare the effects of a monophasic combined oral contraceptive containing nomegestrol acetate/17 beta-estradiol (NOMAC/E2) on bone mineral density with a combined oral contraceptive containing levonorgestrel/ethinylestradiol (LNG/EE). Design. Prospective, randomized, open-label, comparative clinical study. Setting. Gynecology center in Norway. Population. One hundred and ten women (20-35 years old) actively seeking contraception. Methods. For 26 consecutive 28-day cycles, women received one of the following two treatments: NOMAC/E2 (2.5 mg/1.5 mg) in a 24/4-day regimen (n = 56); or LNG/EE (150 mu g/30 mu g) in a 21/7-day regimen (n = 54). Main outcome measures. Bone mineral density of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, hip and trochanter (measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry); associated z-scores of the lumbar spine and femoral neck. Results. InNOMAC/E2 users, mean (+/- SD) z-score change from baseline for lumbar spine and femoral neck were 0.019 +/- 0.242 and -0.007 +/- 0.228, respectively, vs. 0.121 +/- 0.269 and 0.044 +/- 0.253 in LNG/EE users, respectively. Differences between treatment groups were not significant (p = 0.19 and p = 0.57, respectively). There were no significant differences between changes in hip and trochanter z-scores between NOMAC/E2 and LNG/EE treatments. Conclusions. After two years, NOMAC/E2 had no clinically relevant effect on bone mineral density. No significant difference in the effect on bone mineral density between NOMAC/E2 and LNG/EE was observed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available