4.7 Article

Maximizing reliability with energy conservation for parallel task scheduling in a heterogeneous cluster

Journal

INFORMATION SCIENCES
Volume 319, Issue -, Pages 113-131

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2015.02.023

Keywords

Cluster computing; Energy consumption; List scheduling; Parallel application; Reliability

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61133005, 61432005, 61370095, 61472124]
  2. National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Hunan [12JJ1011]
  3. Innovation Fund Designated for Graduate Students of Hunan Province [CX2013B142]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A heterogeneous computing system in a cluster is a promising computing platform, which attracts a large number of researchers due to its high performance potential. High system reliability and low power consumption are two primary objectives for a data center. Dynamic voltage scaling (DVS) has been proved to be the most efficient technique and is exploited widely to realize a low power system. Unfortunately, transient fault is inevitable during the execution of an application while applying the DVS technique. Most existing scheduling algorithms for precedence constrained tasks in a multiprocessor computer system do not adequately consider task reliability. In this paper, we devise a novel Reliability Maximization with Energy Constraint (RMEC) algorithm, which incorporates three important phases, including task priority establishment, frequency selection, and processor assignment. The RMEC algorithm can effectively balance the tradeoff between high reliability and energy consumption. Our rigorous performance evaluation study, based on both randomly generated task graphs and the graphs of some real-world applications, shows that our scheduling algorithm surpasses the existing algorithms in terms of system reliability enhancement and energy consumption saving. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available