4.4 Article

The release of S-100B and NSE in severe traumatic head injury is associated with APOE ε4

Journal

ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA
Volume 154, Issue 4, Pages 675-680

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00701-012-1292-6

Keywords

Severe traumatic brain injury; APOE epsilon 4; S-100B; NSE

Funding

  1. Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Umea University
  2. Tore Nilsson Foundation
  3. Kempe Foundation
  4. Capio Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this article we tested the hypothesis that the level of two biochemical markers of brain injury may be associated with the apolipoprotein E (APOE) epsilon 4 allele. In this prospective consecutive study patients with sTBI were included (n = 48). Inclusion criteria were Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score a parts per thousand currency signaEuro parts per thousand 8 at the time of intubation and sedation, patient age between 15 and 70 years, an initial cerebral perfusion pressure > 10 mmHg, and arrival to our level-one trauma university hospital within 24 h after trauma. Blood samples for neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and S-100B were collected as soon as possibly after arrival, and then twice daily (12-h intervals) for 5 consecutive days. Venous blood was used for APOE genotype determination. Clinical outcome at 3 months after injury was assessed with the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE). Significantly higher levels of the maximal S-100B (S-100B(max)) and area under the curve (S-100B(AUC)) were found in subjects with the APOE epsilon 4 allele compared to those with non-epsilon 4. A similar tendency was observed for NSEmax and NSEAUC, though not statistically significant. Our data indicate that there might be a gene-induced susceptibility to severe traumatic brain injury and that patients with the APOE epsilon 4 allele may be more predisposed to brain cellular damage measured as S-100B and NSE. Thus, it seems to be of importance to consider the APOE genotype in interpreting the levels of the biomarkers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available