4.7 Article

First-principles simulations of plasticity in body-centered-cubic magnesium-lithium alloys

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 64, Issue -, Pages 198-207

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.10.030

Keywords

Magnesium alloy; Stacking-fault energy; Peierls stress; Density functional theory; Atomistic simulation

Funding

  1. Office of Naval Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

First-principles quantum mechanics is an increasingly important tool for predicting material properties when designing novel alloys with optimized mechanical properties. In this study, we employ first-principles orbital-free density functional theory (OFDFT) to study plastic properties of body-centered-cubic (bcc) Mg-Li alloys as potential lightweight metals for use in, e.g., vehicle applications. The accuracy of the method as a predictive tool is benchmarked against the more accurate Kohn-Sham DFT (KSDFT). With a new analytic local electron-ion pseudopotential, OFDFT is shown to be comparable in accuracy to KSDFT with the conventional non-local pseudopotential for many properties of Mg-Li alloys, including lattice parameters and energy differences between phases. After this validation, we calculate generalized stacking fault energies (SFEs) of a perfect lattice and Peierls stresses (sigma(p)'s) for dislocation motion in various bcc Mg-Li alloys. Such predictions have not been made previously with any level of theory. Based on analysis of SFE barriers, we propose that alloys with 31-50 at.% Li will exhibit the greatest strength. Their sigma(p)'s are predicted to be 0.18-0.31 GPa. The Li concentration in this range (31-50 at.%) has little impact on plastic properties of bcc Mg-Li alloys, while atomic-level disorder may decrease the sigma(p). This range of sigma(p) is similar to the industrial goal for potential lightweight Mg alloys. (C) 2013 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available