4.7 Article

Non-equilibrium solute partitioning in a laser re-melted Al-Li-Cu alloy

Journal

ACTA MATERIALIA
Volume 61, Issue 19, Pages 7432-7436

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.08.050

Keywords

Aluminum alloys; Rapid solidification; Solute segregation; Laser re-melting

Funding

  1. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. McGill University Engineering Doctoral Award
  3. Regroupement Aluminium (REGAL), Aluminum Research Centre (REGAL)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aluminum-lithium alloy AA2199 was rapidly solidified through the application of a laser re-melting process to determine the relationship between laser pulse energy and microsegregation during solidification. It was determined that laser pulse energies of the order of 0.125-0.5 J s resulted in a fine cellular solidification structure. Through comparison of the measured cell spacing with that predicted by the Kurz-Giovanola-Trivedi (KGT) model it was possible to estimate that solidification front velocities (SPV) of between 3 and 25 cm s(-1) occurred during solidification. The SPV calculated from the KGT model was then input into the continuous growth model for solute trapping developed by Aziz to predict the deviation from equilibrium partitioning during solidification for all pulse energy levels employed. The chemical profile of lithium within the re-melted samples was measured using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and compared with that expected for equilibrium segregation. Measurement of the lattice parameter via X-ray diffraction revealed that the solute trapping phenomenon resulted in the formation of a super-saturated solid solution, as is evident through a reduction of the lattice parameter from 4.0485 angstrom for the starting material to 4.0399 angstrom in the material re-melted with a pulse energy of 0.125 J. (C) 2013 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available